zerownik.pl

I show up after a long absence, and life has shown how many of my predictions came true. At the outset I want to emphasize the great power that the success of our, idealists who support the movement Palikot is very close to my heart. Not after this I went to the Congress, to now deny him a right to exist. My concern is that this new political entity in our parliament, not fizzled out, that our dreams and hopes are not dissolved in the elections for four years ...

My first remark is that the winner does not Palikot Movement, and the Janusz Palikot. A simple test of this thesis is to ask what will happen with the Movement Palikot, when the Chairman will disappear from public life. When we look at this problem on the other hand, what would happen if Janusz Palikot now introduced a brand of a commodity, "Palikot"? In the first case the motion would cease to exist, while in the second, this new product would hit the sales, not only in our country! It was a good maneuver only for elections, which helped launch the political totally unknown product. Janusz I blame that for the year preceding the election, every step of promoting themselves, not us, but from a marketing point of view, there was another, equally effective output. It was too little time. Now, for four consecutive years, we can show you a new personality to be able to pull the electoral roll in the next election.

The second observation is that the discussion program, was, to put it mildly, poor. The result of this situation is that today, when someone asks a journalist wanting to know what you mean, MEPs elect focuses fare poorly. Mass of generalities, which is difficult to discuss, and for the total electorate, of course. The first edge of the slogan "separation of church and state" is completely without substance. No one said about the social consequences of the presence of the church school, or that the most important issue is that the church instills in our children a sense of guilt. Those with guilt are easily manipulated. This lack of concrete will be in our characters and can make the voters eager for change, disappointed us and it will be a very dangerous situation for us all. The problem is so important that any move, no matter how just, kind, will be burdened with a lack of confidence and gave us the necessary changes. This applies equally to the other terms that appear on the banners in the election campaign.

I missed some important, groundbreaking vision of society, which should happen in 20 or more years ... they said nothing to even out for us on the prevailing socio-economic system, which makes the state mainly deals with the sharing of hardship. I've run this guiding thought, which convince me that in future there is a chance to make a huge qualitative change in our lives and our electorate, which will make it a live richly and support will be needed only for those who truly need this assistance .

It is time to define the reasons that make so many injustices in various aspects of our lives both social and economic development.

I have such a proposal, which could make in the future will not be such unemployment, will not be such a misery, there will be many negatives that are now so tease us in our daily lives. It seems that you should think over what new quality we can offer to future generations of Poles. It is very important that you realize the changing in ever greater pace of our environment in which we live. One of the most important factor is technological progress. It makes for the foreseeable future, human work obsolete. Today in many companies, the employment of individuals is maintained at about 20% only of the reasons for the humanities. Once we had the opportunity to experience workers' revolts against the steam engine, which reflect the socio - economic situation of our ancestors. One has to finally make it clear that the direct cause of unemployment is technological development, including computerization and robotics in the economy and ever-larger share of these new technologies in our everyday lives. So what is my idea?

Roughly speaking, it is about symmetry, the equality of rights. Slowly, it's time for a revolutionary change in the economy of civil relations with the client to a subject. It is time for significant changes in relation employer - employee. If a citizen shall have the right to profit from operations, this change is obviously somehow relation employer - employee, and a different flow of profits and capital. Can this be achieved? You can, making the jobholder subject to the rights of the operator.

Justification:

Now apply the basic division between employers and employees. The two major players in the market do not have equal rights and obligations under the contract. This inequality lies in the fact that radically different laws apply to the parties. The main difference lies in the fact that the employer is obliged to make a profit, and the employee does not. The employer has the right to charge the costs to an employee, such right does not. The effect of such an approach to the matter is that our country cares about is that employers can generate profits, and employees of such a right does not. You remember that the employer invests, so it must be able to profit from the capital. The more of it on the market, the country becomes richer. Only you have forgotten that the employee also invests its capital in the form of knowledge and skills and their time, which makes the employer can produce anything at all!

I raised the problem is just an incentive to take the kind, firmly in-depth discussion on the topic described above. Adopting it can make a brand new start building a society that finds itself in a new, inexorably approaching, reality. I invite you to comment on this idea.